tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5255808252082956251.post4003172461216876949..comments2024-02-16T01:48:30.016-08:00Comments on mathbionerd: Responding to reviewers can be quality timemathbionerdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17525536407206138695noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5255808252082956251.post-12719792459371103552013-06-23T13:03:33.881-07:002013-06-23T13:03:33.881-07:00I do get frustrated with the time that it takes fo...I do get frustrated with the time that it takes for revisions, but I've begun to wonder whether this frustration is only a symptom of the "publish or perish" culture. If academics were not judged on quantity, the feelings might be different. It would be nice if the whole process could be more transparent. That is, if it could be known in the community when a manuscript is submitted, not just after final acceptance. This is the benefit of the arXiv. :)mathbionerdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17525536407206138695noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5255808252082956251.post-31791448111661675802013-06-23T08:19:48.398-07:002013-06-23T08:19:48.398-07:00I have to say, after going through two rounds of r...I have to say, after going through two rounds of review trying satisfy one stubborn reviewer, it did make my recently accepted paper better. I just wish the process didn't take so long ( 9 months from initial submission to acceptance)Amithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17374419504359860299noreply@blogger.com